While translation has always required the ability to find information, currently this process has moved almost entirely into the digital realm. The CVIL will provide opportunities to understand how Voter ID laws are part of institutional design, are used by actors, shape the voter experience and electoral out-comes. Thirdly, other variables within the dataset are described. The second part of the analysis goes on to describe voter ID laws by whether a jurisdiction has compulsory ID laws, how many different types of ID are accepted and the minimum number of ID documents that must be shown. Data presented show how voter ID laws are distributed globally, regionally, by regime type and level of democracy. Which has collected data on 246 individual electoral jurisdictions. This paper begins to address this shortfall by presenting the Comparative Voter ID Law (CVIL) index.
it is difficult to answer research questions put forward in this special issue, especially the second.
With no consolidated dataset of voter ID laws existing outside the U.S.A. This paper contributes to this understanding by looking at Voter Identification (ID) laws. Using the strategic-relational approach, as outlined in this special issue, it is possible to better understand how electoral laws shape the voter experience and electoral outcomes. Relating electoral laws to electoral integrity has long been a focus of academic research.
0 kommentar(er)
